Here We Explain The Fundamental Difference Between Creativity And Innovation In Your Business

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Here We Explain The Fundamental Difference Between Creativity And Innovation In Your Business

There’s much confusion surrounding creativity and innovation.

“Creative types,” in particular, claim that creativity and innovation can’t be measured. Performance, however, demands measurement so you can identify what success looks like. In a world that changes every second, it’s imperative that companies figure out the difference between creativity and innovation.

You better believe they’re different.

Creativity vs Innovation

The main difference between creativity and innovation is the focus. Creativity is about unleashing the potential of the mind to conceive new ideas. Those concepts could manifest themselves in any number of ways, but most often, they become something we can see, hear, smell, touch, or taste. However, creative ideas can also be thought experiments within one person’s mind.

Creativity is subjective, making it hard to measure, as our creative friends assert.

Innovation, on the other hand, is entirely measurable. Innovation is about introducing change into relatively stable systems. It’s also concerned with the work required to make an idea viable. By identifying an unrecognised and unmet need, an organisation can use innovation to apply its creative resources to design an appropriate solution and reap a return on its investment.

Organisations often chase creativity, but what they need to pursue is innovation. Theodore Levitt puts it best: “What is often lacking is not creativity in the idea-creating sense but innovation in the action-producing sense, i.e. putting ideas to work.”

Managing Innovation

Because creativity and innovation are often confused, it’s long been assumed that you cannot force innovation within an organisation. Innovation is either evident, or it isn’t. The introduction of a common language for innovation — design thinking — enables organisations to measure milestones in their innovative efforts better.

To employ design thinking, it’s necessary to understand it as a system of overlapping spaces, rather than a set of process steps to move through. Those spaces are: inspiration, where the problem that motivates solution-finding is found; ideation, the process of generating and developing ideas; and implementation, the activities that enable a creative concept to move from the drawing board to the marketplace. Any design thinking-based project may loop back to an earlier space more than once as a team explores, develops, and implements its idea.
Design thinking provides a consistent approach to defining challenges. It helps organisations identify problems before they even begin the brainstorming sessions most associated with creativity. Now, organisations can see what they were missing when previous ideas didn’t reach market sustainability.

Using design thinking, organisations can capitalise on creativity by paying attention to the life of the idea after its initial development. Applied creativity must always lead to innovation — linking a great idea with an actual customer need (or, better yet, the needs of a whole market!).

The need of clear leadership for innovation

The use of design thinking in this manner also demands the guidance of engaged leadership.

Leaders are critical to the success of any group’s long-term innovation strategy. It’s their job to ensure that innovation is consistently pursued and their employees don’t settle into business as usual. They set the tone for what is, and is not, possible in the company through their attention and action.

Two main issues with nurturing innovation

Organisations serious about fostering innovation have to wrestle with two main issues: risk-taking and failure aversion. All change involves risk, and all risks include the possibility of failure. Failure should never be seen as a black mark; it is a learning experience. Leaders and their organisations cannot be afraid of failure — or they will never incorporate the innovation they need to meet customers’ needs truly. Design thinking offers a path to risk-taking that’s manageable, repeatable, and driven toward maximising the effectiveness of the new idea.

Of course, the very term “innovation” connotes something new and different. Still, paying attention to companies that are consistently innovative in their industries is always a good practice.

Companies to Model

Consider these companies that use the principles of design thinking to achieve their strategic goals:

  1. Proctor & Gamble embraced innovation under former CEO A.G. Lafley. During his tenure, P&G’s value increased by more than $100 billion. In 2000, it had 10 billion-dollar consumer brands; today, it has 22.
  2. Kaiser Permanente is the largest not-for-profit health provider in the USA. Kaiser’s National Facilities Services group has, for over five years, been working on the Total Health Environment, a program applying design thinking to every aspect of Kaiser’s operations, from medical records to colour palettes. The results speak for themselves: improved patient health, satisfaction, soundness of sleep, the speed of healing, and cost control.
  3. Square is mainly associated with innovation since its plugin device helps millions of mobile vendors and small business owners. No longer are they confined to cash payments or expensive credit card machines. Square noticed that the economy was quickly becoming paperless and provided customers with a way to keep up.

Creativity is vital in today’s business world, but it’s only the beginning. Organisations need to foster creativity. Driving business results by running ideas through an innovation process puts those ideas to work — for companies and their customers.

Creativity is the price of admission, but it’s innovation that pays the bills.

16 thoughts on “Here We Explain The Fundamental Difference Between Creativity And Innovation In Your Business”

  1. Really interesting content here on how to turn creativity into innovation. New product development that meets an unmet need is a great way to forward your focus into what could improve the market place. I agree, that failure should be perceived as a learning experience because without trial and error, we’d be stuck in the mundane without proper evolution.

    1. Bradley Pallister

      Innovation needs the willingness to fail, big and fast. Fail fast also means learn fast and succeed more. Learn how to develop a tolerance for failure in order to experience success. Einstein was a failure at the end of the day.

  2. Yes they are different but go hand in hand. If you ask me Creativity or Innovation all starts from one thing an idea/concept. Take for example new product ideas, You must have that first for the process to begin is it not? If yes then it both concepts can and should work together

  3. conrad pranze villas

    Inventiveness is tied in with releasing the capability of the psyche to consider novel thoughts. Those ideas could show themselves in quite a few different ways, yet regularly, they become something we can see, hear, smell, contact, or taste. In any case, Innovation will greatly help those in need.

  4. Idea generation that is backed up by systematic creativity can do wonders for an organization. I am happy to see creativity being taken more seriously at the workplace.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin